SUPER THREAD: speculating on the underlying psyche of published writers
Posted by:
Sawfish (IP Logged)
Date: 30 September, 2020 11:34AM
I could easily lead us astray here, and away from fantasy entirely, but it's not my intent.
It occurred to me that the writer's "psyche" (his/her underlying deep motivations, self-concept, worldview) has a profound effect on the themes dealt with, the plot resolutions, but for the purposes of this discussion, the *flavor* of their works, after one reads them.
I guess that I'm talking about mood created, as an evoked response.
So I see writers such a Kipling, CAS, even HPL, as well-adjusted with decent self-concept, and this informs their worldview.
But there are authors I've read where I don't get that feeling at all. To kick off the discussion, I'll name three writers of popular fiction--two of whom write fantasy--who create a bad taste on my aesthetic "tongue".
Thomas Ligotti
Clive Barker
James Ellroy
I don't want to lead anyone's thinking in any particular direction and will reserve further comments until later, but I'd like to solicit responses from my fellow EDers. What are your thoughts/impressions, and why?
--Sawfish
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The food at the new restaurant is awful, but at least the portions are large."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~