Re: New Member
Posted by:
Gavin Smith (IP Logged)
Date: 30 April, 2003 12:00PM
While Boyd is quite right that talent and fame do not always go together, that doesn't really do much for the HPL vs. CAS question. I suppose we agree that they both bad talent. A very special development process took place with Lovecraft as his posthumous fame caught on and found sometimes questionable support in different areas of popular culture. Lovecraft can be found represented in radio drama, motion pictures, television, even comics, even if most of these treatments are rather bad. Smith had seldom jumped from one medium to another, either successfully or otherwise. We might find internal reasons in Smith's work to suggest why so few adaptations have been attempted. But in many ways, the Lovecraft cult has begun to bring similar popularity to Smith. Jason Thompson, whose wonderful comic mini-series based on The Dream Quest of Unknown Kadath is in the process of being turned into an animated feature film, has also begun work on another comic series based on Smith's Hyperborea tales. It has been suggested that Lovecraft's style of writing is difficult or impossible to translate into cinema, and I don't plan to disagree. But they keep trying. With Smith, there has been almost no tradition of adapting his works. CASmith on TV seems limited to Night Gallery's Return of the Sorcerer. To finish up, I suspect that the development of Lovecraft's popularity was uniquely his and simply is not comparable to the more limited awareness of CASmith. It may irritate fans of Smith and even Robert E. Howard, but I think in both cases the often repeated phrase, friend of H.P. Lovecraft, may be there to stay.