Re: Fritz Leiber
Posted by:
Radovarl (IP Logged)
Date: 18 September, 2021 09:14AM
"But, ... what I miss in these books, ... is more of a spiritual detachment from the material. The continual chase after treasure, money, alcohol, and wenches, gets miserly and dissatisfying. Leiber was himself an alcoholic, struggling with the sordidness of that morass, and I never sense in these books that he soars above the physical and worldly identification."
Leiber was a materialist of sorts, so I'm puzzled why you would find this surprising. If you'll notice, though, The Twain are repeatedly stripped of their (mostly) ill-gotten gains from chasing after wealth and sensation, briefly humbled by the ephemeral nature of worldly possessions, status, and experiences. While I agree that Leiber never "soars" *above* the physical and worldly, I think that's precisely the point. It's an intentional artistic approach. As stand-ins for himself (and ostensibly HOF), Fafhrd and the Mouser are forced to wallow in material realities and are continually faced with their own mortality and unimportance in an indifferent universe they can never truly understand.
As Leiber puts it in the introduction to his own self-selected collection "The Best of Fritz Leiber", "The Supreme Goddess of the Universe is Mystery". As someone who described his two main influences as Shakespeare and H. P. Lovecraft, I think this aesthetic exhibits exactly what one would expect (and want, in my case) from someone who continues and celebrates the stylistic tradition of the former while refining, nay sublimating, the more sophisticated modern worldview (in the narrow sense) of the latter.
While CAS was certainly an influence on Leiber, I would argue that it's more in choice of milieu as backdrop for these tales. His modulation of language is much more precise, if less poetic and more dramatic, than CAS's, and his lexical range is of an entirely different sort, favoring the Elizabethan rather than italianate flourishes and homonymic proliferation of Smith.
I myself think Leiber is one of the best fantasy writers exactly *because* he engages with the worldly and material through "low fantasy", while championing (through his champions) the human spirit of adventure that makes both high fantasy and S&S so alluring. He avoids the essentially trivial nature of a Dunsany, as well as the unconscious self-parody of REH's Conan or Moorcock's Elric.
All that said, most of his "science fiction" I can barely read. IMO with some evidence, he wrote most of this stuff because it was what was selling (hello Misters Heinlein, Asimov, et al.), and it just wasn't his forte.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 18 Sep 21 | 09:15AM by Radovarl.