The last British politician to warn about the Sub-Saharan African predation of the UK. Now it's too late. White women however have orchestrated treason because they are besotted with African (especially African) and Asian "testosterone", engendering opportunistic and predatory hybrids which have been bred to supplant pure blooded white males who are not only expendable but branded as enemies by the Afrocentric society white women have painstakingly constructed for their bastardized thuggish offspring to flourish and thrive in at the expense of pure white men and boys.

Clark Ashton Smith's just won't be born anymore. Instead what we'll have is a caricature of Western civilisation, presided over by hexadecaroon thugs (both sexes) who can only mimic but never create the existential angst which was the life ichor of Europa.

I don't despise white women for doing this (they are worthless but not worth hating) but I do loathe their illegitimate offspring and I hope it will soon perish.



Edited 10 time(s). Last edit at 22 Oct 23 | 01:02PM by ethnic purity.

Afro-Caribbeans and Jamaicans want to erase white hereditary and replace it with their own. White women have always enjoyed fraternizing with these thugs only now their purpose is preservation and renewal. Black males are sexual scavengers but white are collaborators.

Asian males are arch sexual perverts but they still construe white men as the greater threat to their own preservation so will glady hybridize with white females to thin the white male population still further.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 22 Oct 23 | 01:30PM by ethnic purity.

I’m a liberal, progressive atheist myself, so I can’t agree with any of this.

I also happen to adore CAS.

I have observed that most or many of the posters here tend to be on the conservative side of things. That’s fine—I know and like many people to the right of me politically. I don’t make friends (or enemies) on that basis.

I’ve read all CAS’s stories, some of his poetry, many of his letters (especially to HPL), and pretty much everything else available on this site and elsewhere. He doesn’t seem to be a racist that I can tell. He’s made a few off-color comments, particularly about Jews, that I can’t approve of, but I mainly sense that he didn’t have strong opinions along these lines.

Now, I don’t know, and likely never will, how or where Ethnic Purity arrived at his viewpoint, but I think I have a guess. This really sounds like it is coming from someone who has been sexually rejected a number of times (at least) by ‘white’ women. I don’t assert that this is true, I merely suspect it.

Personally, I think we’d all be better off if the various human races intermingled for many generations to the point where we don’t have these sub-categories of races anymore. I see no point in keeping races ‘pure’. Also, I can’t really get worked up over ‘cancel culture’ or ‘wokeness’ or other social-political buzz words, most of which aren’t very well defined anyway. I’m not a fan of hypocrisy either.

So, am I totally out of line here? Should I stay away from this forum? Am I too radical for the members here?

I’m more interested in art and literature than in getting into internet fights.

Pharpetron Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I’m a liberal, progressive atheist myself, so I
> can’t agree with any of this.


If the poster is who I think he is, I don't think he's religious. At least he dislikes Christianity as a foreign religion derived from Eastern cultures, though correct me if I'm wrong.


> I also happen to adore CAS.
>
> I have observed that most or many of the posters
> here tend to be on the conservative side of
> things. That’s fine—I know and like many
> people to the right of me politically. I don’t
> make friends (or enemies) on that basis.
>
> I’ve read all CAS’s stories, some of his
> poetry, many of his letters (especially to HPL),
> and pretty much everything else available on this
> site and elsewhere. He doesn’t seem to be a
> racist that I can tell. He’s made a few
> off-color comments, particularly about Jews, that
> I can’t approve of, but I mainly sense that he
> didn’t have strong opinions along these lines.


I agree that CAS didn't seem to think too deeply about racial purity or racial supremacy. I'm not sure if he would have married outside of his race, but he didn't seem like the kind to get hung up on anyone else doing so. His poems and fiction make it clear that all races are miniscule in the face of the cosmos, and that self-absorbed arrogance and delusions of superiority are found in all organized groups, systems, and societies. He was also more eager to explore exotic cultures, even those of alien entities. And he did write the unusual story "The Venus of Azombeii", in which a white man has a profound and sexual romance with a black priestess of Africa. CAS was clearly fascinated by the world beyond his knowledge.

As I recall, he had friendly relations with some Japanese people in his later years (a haiku poet and some foreign fans), and he was amiable with the Chinese shopkeepers in town. He had also read a great deal about Zen Buddhism, as well as the writings of Lafcadio Hearn. In a few letters, he expressed such contempt for America that he claimed he would move to Asia if he had the money for it.


> Personally, I think we’d all be better off if
> the various human races intermingled for many
> generations to the point where we don’t have
> these sub-categories of races anymore. I see no
> point in keeping races ‘pure’. Also, I
> can’t really get worked up over ‘cancel
> culture’ or ‘wokeness’ or other
> social-political buzz words, most of which
> aren’t very well defined anyway. I’m not a
> fan of hypocrisy either.


I have nothing against racial mingling, certain forms of social tolerance, etc. After all, I'm of mixed race myself, and I simply don't care about things like skin and ethnicity when socializing with others. I'm more interested in individual minds, not countries, cultures, or phenotypes. I once dated a Somalian immigrant, not because I respected or cared about her cultural background, but because she was a lively, upstanding, and above all creative and intelligent individual. However, I don't care for the way popular media likes to dramatize and glorify inclusivity, which to me should be a simple matter of accepting people as unique individuals, not some thoughtless parade celebrating moral cliches and gawdy rainbows. In that sense, I *do* dislike common ideas of "wokeness" and "cancel culture", which to me are superficial expressions.


> So, am I totally out of line here? Should I stay
> away from this forum? Am I too radical for the
> members here?
>
> I’m more interested in art and literature than
> in getting into internet fights.


I think most members here (what lingering few exist), conservative or not, are more interested in discussing art and literature. Note they haven't responded to these recent threads, and last time this person posted similar threads all activity went silent until everything was deleted. Whenever I have seen political discussions, I've rarely seen heated arguments. They tend to be engaging but mellow about it.

I don't think this site is active enough for your presence to even matter, but I doubt anyone here would care enough to wish you gone.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 26 Oct 23 | 11:30PM by Hespire.

Thanks for the thoughtful response, Hespire.

I’m not much of a social media user, and so I don’t really get where internet ‘trolls’ are coming from, or what they want. I would think maximum exposure is part of it, but then why post something like this at Eldritch Dark, which is not exactly a hotspot on the web?

I only mentioned my political/religious views as a kind of general background for my response, to perhaps show that a modern liberal fellow can enjoy writings like Smith’s. I would certainly disagree with anyone (liberal or otherwise) who thinks that older writings (or art) should somehow conform to modern ideals. That doesn’t make sense to me.

Your description anent Smith’s cosmic viewpoint tracks with what I know of him as well. It’s a view I share. I don’t really belong to any kinds of groups, except maybe just by coincidence (I used to be registered as independent, but changed to Dem in order to vote in primaries a while back). Racism, nationalism, religious groups all seem too dogmatic and generally petty. I have no interest in dividing humans up along these lines.

Cancel Culture—to be honest, I’m not sure what that even is. I guess it has something to do with right-wing speakers not able to speak at college campus’s, or something like that. Anyone who is complaining loudly about cancel culture while also banning books or limiting freedoms (such as access to abortion) is someone I can’t really take seriously. The definition for cancel culture will have to be pretty narrow for it to make any sense. It can’t really be about silencing right-wing voices when those voices have an entire TV network broadcasting their propaganda 24/7. Right-wing viewpoints are readily available to anyone who wants to hear them. What is being cancelled?

Well, one thing is for sure: we are in for strange days ahead. Thank goodness for quality fiction, rare as it is.

Socialism is not a "modern ideal", or a new idea. You certainly aren't an Independent!

jkh

Kipling--I'm pretty sure I don't understand your post. I'm not a socialist, nor have I said that I was. I've never said socialism is a modern ideal or a new idea. You seem to be reading between the lines and coming up with the wrong conclusions.

But I do agree on this--I'm not an Independant, though I was registered as 'decline to state' for many years.