Sawfish Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> WE need to be careful with terminology here, K.
> I'm using bourgeoisie in the sense that Marx uses
> it in the Manifesto, and yep, they are the hidden
> controllers.
>
> It's good to understand that there are petty
> bourgeoisie (I'm one) who are being eliminated by
> the bourgeoisie, the ruling class, and the
> proletariat, which would also include those now in
> the ranks of the homeless--assuming they had the
> organizational skills to form ranks, in the first
> place.
>
I agree that there are different ranks of the bourgeoisie, and that the upper ranks may eat the lower. Although, I see the top financial elite (I don't quite count Soros among them, although he is high and causes great havoc with his riches. He was early on employed by Rothschild, and was
initiated and helped along, on condition of doing their bidding, which he gladly did.) as being above the bourgeoisie, they are not part of that community so to speak - they float over it. And they don't vote, but just watch cynically from above, profiteering from both left and right governments.
No, I don't think the proletariat had those skills in the first place. The revolution was instigated by the bank elite (i.e. Rothschild), to get at the riches of the upper classes. Rothschild also financed all the big wars since Napoleon, including WW1 and WW2. It is documented in the links above, and in
The Money Masters. They early on realized, that giving loans to countries (rather than merely to individuals) was the most profitable way of increasing their vast fortunes, and establishing World political dominion.
>
> Bergeron is uncannily on the money in many ways, ...
>
> Try giving it to a Millennial or Zoomer to
> read--not a smile, not a laugh. There's nothing
> funny, at all, about the fight for equality, you
> see.
>
Horrible. It is nightmarish.